Who we help

Four shapes of practice, four different build orders.The four kinds of audiology practice we work with

These are not personas invented for a landing page. They are the four situations that genuinely need different work first, which is the only reason each one gets its own page.

Single-location practices

One office, one or two providers

The most common shape in the field and the one with the clearest strategy, because there is exactly one catchment and no internal competition to manage.

First priorities

Google Business Profile rebuilt properly, which is nearly always the fastest win available
Two to three uncontested service lines, sized against local demand before anything is written
Accessibility and call-first conversion fixes on the existing site

What changes for this shape →

Multi-location practices

Two to five sites, overlapping catchments

Once there are two pins in one metro, the hardest problem stops being the competition and starts being the architecture.

First priorities

Location page architecture that stops your own pins competing
Geo-grid across every catchment, with the contested middle identified
Profile work per location, including category and service divergence where the sites genuinely differ

What changes for this shape →

ENT-affiliated audiology

Audiology inside an ENT or medical group

A different problem entirely. The competition is partly external and partly the surgical side of your own organisation.

First priorities

A real audiology wing within the group site, with its own service line pages
Vestibular and tinnitus as the crossover markets nobody in the group is writing for
Direct-to-patient entry points that reduce pure dependence on internal referral

What changes for this shape →

Groups and acquired practices

Six or more sites, often with legacy brands

At six locations the problems stop being about ranking and start being about what happens to the names of the practices you bought.

First priorities

The consolidation decision, worked through market by market before anything is migrated
Migration and redirect strategy if consolidation is chosen, staged rather than switched
Entity maintenance across a roster that changes

What changes for this shape →

Not sure which one you are?

Most practices sit cleanly in one. The interesting cases are the ones that do not — a two-office practice that behaves like a group, or a department inside a medical group that operates independently. Those are worth a conversation rather than a page.

Request a practice audiogram